FileZilla Pro vs. SmartFTP (2026): One Edition Beats a Four-Tier Stack at a Third of the Price

FileZilla Pro and SmartFTP are two of the most established commercial FTP clients on the market, and both target the same professional Windows audience that needs reliable transfers across FTP/SFTP and modern cloud storage. The headline differences come down to four things: platform reach (FileZilla Pro runs on Windows, macOS and Linux, while SmartFTP is Windows-only), edition complexity (FileZilla Pro ships as a single SKU with everything included, while SmartFTP splits cloud and advanced features across four paid tiers), throughput (FileZilla Pro is consistently faster across SFTP, S3, Google Drive and OneDrive in our benchmarks), and price (FileZilla Pro costs roughly a third of SmartFTP’s Professional edition for a comparable feature surface).

Protocol and Feature Support

The protocol footprint is where SmartFTP’s edition matrix shows up most clearly. FileZilla Pro exposes every supported protocol in a single product, while SmartFTP’s cloud connectors live in the Enterprise and Ultimate editions only.

Protocol / Feature FileZilla Pro SmartFTP
FTP / FTPS Yes Yes (all editions)
SFTP (over SSH) Yes Yes (all editions)
WebDAV / WebDAVS Yes Yes (all editions)
Amazon S3 / S3-compatible Yes Enterprise & Ultimate only
Google Cloud Storage Yes Enterprise & Ultimate only
Microsoft Azure Blob Yes No
Backblaze B2 Yes Enterprise & Ultimate only
Box Yes Enterprise & Ultimate only
Dropbox Yes No
Google Drive Yes Ultimate only
Microsoft OneDrive Yes Ultimate only
OpenStack Swift Yes No
Windows / macOS / Linux Windows, macOS, Linux Windows only
FXP server-to-server transfer Yes Yes
Folder synchronization Yes Professional and above
Scheduling / automation Queue + command-line Advanced scheduler (Pro and above)
Built-in terminal emulator No Ultimate only
HIPAA / FIPS compliance claims No formal certification HIPAA 5010, FIPS 140-2/140-3, 186-4
Multi-user support Single user (per-seat license) Enterprise edition

Performance Benchmarks

Throughput tests across the four most-used protocols show a consistent advantage for FileZilla Pro. The gap is widest on Google Drive, where FileZilla Pro is roughly twice as fast as SmartFTP, and stays meaningful — between 25% and 50% — on SFTP, Amazon S3 and Microsoft OneDrive.

Protocol FileZilla Pro SmartFTP
SFTP 14 Mb/s 11 Mb/s
Amazon S3 11 Mb/s 9 Mb/s
Google Drive 20 Mb/s 10 Mb/s
Microsoft OneDrive 9 Mb/s 6 Mb/s

Pricing and Licensing

FileZilla Pro is sold as a single perpetual license at USD 19.99 on the Mac App Store and the Microsoft Store, with one year of free updates included. There is no edition split — every protocol and connector listed in the table above is available in the box, on every supported operating system, for the same price.

SmartFTP uses a four-tier edition model and offers each edition either as a perpetual license (with one year of updates) or as a yearly subscription. Indicative perpetual prices in 2026 are roughly USD 36.95 (Home), USD 69.95 (Professional), USD 144.95 (Enterprise), with the Ultimate tier sitting above Enterprise. Cloud storage providers and the terminal emulator only become available once you reach the Enterprise or Ultimate tier — meaning a buyer who needs S3, Box and Google Drive will pay an order of magnitude more than a FileZilla Pro buyer for the same protocol coverage. For up-to-date SmartFTP pricing and the exact feature split, see the SmartFTP editions page.

Pros and Cons

FileZilla Pro
Pros
  • +Runs natively on Windows, macOS and Linux from a single codebase.
  • +Every protocol and cloud connector — S3, Azure, Google Cloud, Backblaze B2, Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive — included in one edition.
  • +One-time perpetual license at a low entry price, with no edition matrix to navigate.
  • +Built on the trusted FileZilla open-source foundation, with a familiar dual-pane interface and active maintenance.
  • +Higher measured throughput on SFTP, S3, Google Drive and OneDrive — up to ~2× faster on Google Drive in our tests.
Cons
  • No formal HIPAA / FIPS compliance certifications, no built-in terminal emulator, and no multi-user / centralized management features for regulated or team deployments.

SmartFTP
Pros
  • +HIPAA 5010 and FIPS 140-2 / 140-3 / 186-4 compliance claims for regulated environments.
  • +Deep power-user feature set — advanced scheduler, integrated editor, visual compare, FXP transfers, password manager integrations.
  • +Built-in terminal emulator and multi-user support available in the higher editions.
  • +Mature, 20+ year Windows lineage with strong professional reputation.
Cons
  • Lower measured throughput than FileZilla Pro on every protocol we tested (SFTP, S3, Google Drive and OneDrive), with the largest gap on Google Drive.
  • Windows-only, with cloud connectors gated behind the Enterprise and Ultimate tiers — making the practical price for comparable cloud coverage significantly higher than FileZilla Pro.

Summary and Final Recommendation

If your team works exclusively on Windows, needs HIPAA or FIPS compliance posture, and is willing to pay for SmartFTP’s Enterprise or Ultimate edition, SmartFTP remains a credible choice with a deeper power-user feature set in areas like scheduling and terminal access. For everyone else — Mac and Linux users, mixed-OS teams, and anyone who needs S3, Azure, Backblaze B2, Box, OneDrive, Google Drive or Dropbox without paying for a top-tier edition — FileZilla Pro delivers the same core protocol coverage in a single cross-platform product, runs measurably faster on every protocol we benchmarked, and costs roughly a third of the price.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,